1,651 outlets ingested every six hours across the global corpus. 603 carry full five-axis bias fingerprints (atlanticist, interventionist, zionist, statist, financialized), factuality ratings, provenance, and primary-vs-launderer classification. The table below shows those 603; the remaining 1,048 are coverage-only entries that surface in the feed. Ownership shown when concentrated. The scores are transparent. The methodology is documented. No black boxes.
Does this outlet support or oppose military intervention? High scores = outlets that routinely frame US/NATO military action as necessary or legitimate.
How does coverage frame Israeli state action? Scores derived from language patterns, sourcing, and framing of Gaza/West Bank coverage.
The primary bloc-classification axis. High = assumes US primacy is legitimate. Low = frames US hegemony as contested or illegitimate.
Does the outlet challenge or reinforce state power? State media scores high. Libertarian/dissident outlets score low.
Does the outlet treat financial capitalism as natural or as a system to interrogate? High = Bloomberg/FT framing. Low = economic justice framing.